― Daniel C. Dennett
A difference only “makes a difference” if it can persist long enough to constrain what comes next. Everything else is noise that thermodynamics erases. Prologue: The Question That Would Not Stay Answered In 1979, Gregory Bateson posed a question that would haunt systems theory, cybernetics, and philosophy of mind for nearly half a century: What is…
Fecundity Without Falsification: The Universal Methodological Escape Hatch There is a reason serious philosophy of science has always insisted that fecundity be tethered to falsifiability. Once that tether is cut, fecundity ceases to be a criterion and becomes a permission slip. And permission slips, once issued, are not honored selectively. Serious philosophy of science treats…
A systematic evaluation of twenty-first century frameworks claiming to explain reality, from Platonic morphospace to mathematical universes to computational ruliad, using constraint-based falsification methodology. What survives scrutiny, what gets demoted to metaphor, and why the distinction matters. Part I: The Problem of Theories That Cannot Fail In 1950, philosopher Antony Flew posed a question that…
Or: How to Win by Suffocation, Not Declaration There is a logical move hiding in plain sight that most critics of religion fail to make. Not because it is difficult, but because it is socially radioactive. The move does not disprove God. It does something far more devastating: it shows that the claim never successfully…
Is Michael Levin’s Platonic Morphogenesis Scientific? From Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: “There is no such thing as philosophy-free science; there is only science whose philosophical baggage is taken on board without examination.” Daniel Dennett An analysis of how a strong naturalistic talk on convergence in biology and AI inadvertently undermines the Platonic metaphysics it was invited…
Michael Levin’s Platonic Space Symposium Discussion #1: TAME, Distributed Agency vs Individual Intent “A deepity is a proposition that seems both important and true—and profound—but that achieves this effect by being ambiguous. On one reading it is manifestly false, but it would be earth-shaking if it were true; on the other reading it is true…
The Empty Set Argument Against Physicalism Curt Jaimungal recently posted a clip titled “The Empty Set Argument Against Physicalism,” featuring Timothy Williamson, widely regarded as one of the most formidable living philosophers. The title promises intellectual bloodsport: abstract mathematics cage-fighting material reality, two ontologies enter, one ontology leaves. Curt frames the stakes explicitly, noting in voiceover:…
“Competence without comprehension is the way of life of the vast majority of living things on the planet and should be the default presumption until we can demonstrate that some individual organisms really do, in one sense or another, understand what they are doing.” ― Daniel C. Dennett, From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of…
Panpsychism, “Heretical Christian,” Unfalsifiability, and the EvasionPanpsychism, “Heretical Christian,” Unfalsifiability, and the Evasion Our dear panpsychist Philosopher Philip sells “universal fine-tuning” the way late-night infomercials sell ab machines: if you squint hard enough at Bayes’ theorem, the universe secretly wants your love poems. The pitch hovers between cosmology and motivational speaking, but the universe doesn’t…
Why Thermodynamic Monism Keeps Getting Mistaken for Whatever You Hate Most Thermodynamic monism is the claim that biology, cognition, agency, and morphogenesis emerge through constraint satisfaction under thermodynamic limits. Energy budgets matter. Entropy production matters. Information processing has a cost. That is not mysticism, and it is not a vibe. It is the boring part of…
