Research on consciousness measurements, competing theories, phenomenal attribution, and the limits of transporting evidence across organisms and computational systems.
What Erik Svensson, Massimo Pigliucci, and Matthew David Segall reveal about the evidence for physicalism, the residual case for panexperientialism, and what each would have to do to progress.
Assessing Chalmers’s later work, competing accounts of consciousness, and whether claims about phenomenal experience generate discriminating predictions.
How Levin and Resnik’s “Mind Everywhere” Paper Confirmed Every Predicted Critique I Raised to its Authors Two Months Before Publication