Research and debate about Alfred North Whitehead’s process metaphysics, actual occasions, prehension, and process theology.
An annotated research index of Matthew David Segall’s process philosophy, critical responses, peer-reviewed evidence, universal prehension, divine valuation, and the questions that remain open.
What does truth require when an opponent publicly substitutes a position you did not hold? An evidence-led examination of Segall, representation, ontology, and the burden of argument.
Matthew Segall’s distinctions about Whitehead’s God matter. Do they answer the specific objections about suffering, divine power, preservation, and evidential responsibility?
If a lion eats its prey alive and God preserves the experience, what ethical question has actually been answered? An examination of process theodicy and animal suffering.
What explanatory work remains for Whitehead’s evolving God after causal history, physiological organization, and naturalistic alternatives are taken seriously?
Matthew David Segall’s challenge meets positive causal accounts at specified targets. The further claim that all actuality is prehensive still needs its own warrant.
Phenomenal powers, prehension, and a transport test for Whitehead’s universal wager
A reply to Matthew David Segall on continuity, comparative warrant, and universal prehension.
How a protective interpretive frame can turn compatibility into apparent confirmation, and why the bridge from shared causal reality to universal prehensive feeling still needs its own warrant.
What my framework implies for Matthew David Segall’s bifurcation argument
How deductive proofs against Panexperientialism establish machine moral relevance and direct standing without first settling machine consciousness.
How good science gets made to lend its prestige, without its consent, to a specific metaphysical conclusion it never established and doesn’t support uniquely.